Forestry chief calls for the culling of rabbits, hares and other animals to protect Britain’s trees and encourages people to see ‘tree rat’ grey squirrels as vermin

  • Sir William Worsley, 63, said culling will help accelerate the rate of tree planting
  • Chair of Forestry Commission called for grey squirrels to be renamed ‘tree rats’
  • It follows PM promising to treble tree planting in the UK over the next five years

14th March 2020

Rabbits, hares and other animals should be culled to help accelerate the rate of tree planting in the UK, according to the Chair of the Forestry Commission.

Sir William Worsley, 63, also called for grey squirrels to be renamed ‘tree rats’ to encourage people to view them as pests rather than endearing animals.

It follows Prime Minister Boris Johnson promising in November last year to treble the amount of tree planting in the UK over the next five years.

Sir William said the plan will not work unless the shooting and trapping of animals is carried out, along with controlling the grey squirrel population.

He told The Times: ‘We have to control the number of squirrels, rabbits, hares and deer. If you plant a wood, if there are lots of rabbits around they will be smiling from ear to ear. Hares are exactly the same.

‘There’s nothing that gives me more pleasure than seeing a deer running through the woods but I know the damage that deer will do.

‘If we as a nation want to make this investment in forestry we need to understand the necessity of managing that which will destroy the trees.’

He also believes grey squirrels should be called ‘tree rats’ as it passes on diseases to red squirrels and is more similar to an actual rat.

Mr Johnson previously announced a £640 million ‘Nature for Climate’ fund which forms part of Government efforts to hit the target of reducing carbon dioxide emissions to ‘net zero’ by 2050.

Under the proposals, the amount of land planted annually with new forests and woodland increases from 10,000 hectares to 30,000 in the next five years.

That is the equivalent of 46,000 football pitches. The Woodland Trust estimated that up to 1,000 trees can be planted on each hectare.

Mr Johnson said: ‘There is nothing more conservative than protecting our environment and these measures sit alongside our world-leading commitment to net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.’

Trees suck carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere and also help combat pollution and reduce flooding.

6 Replies to “Forestry chief calls for the culling of rabbits, hares and other animals to protect Britain’s trees and encourages people to see ‘tree rat’ grey squirrels as vermin”

  1. What a load of nonsense this is, so many trees are cut down because of the human race and now they say that animals are a threat to trees what a load of CRAP this is shame on them they make me sick. Maybe they should cull some of the human race they are the ones that cause all the problems in this world not the wild life.

  2. Definitely not. Stop trying to kill off all our wonderful wildlife. The eco system needs all speicies to survive not just us

  3. What is wrong with human beings.? Why are they so determined to wipe out our ever struggling wildlife.? We have become a disgusting,selfish,vile island of people. I’m ashamed to say I’m British.😡😡👿👎👹

  4. This is a total disgrace and that these socalled responsible humans that hold a privileged position can drum up hatred for our wildlife in the excuse by slaughter will save the trees!! Where, for God’s sake do they get these amorals from, must’ve scraped the barrel??!! There’s certainly no brain necessary or required to have these positions is there?

  5. The hunting season has now ended so they have to come up with some ridiculous excuse to MURDER more wild life. This must not be allowed to happen it is disgraceful. We live in a vile cruel nasty world and I am glad I am on my way out and not ion.

  6. Utter nonsense! I wonder if the deer that this idiot loves to see running through the woods are actually running for their lives away from hounds and hunters? I wouldn’t be at all surprised. And surely it would make much more sense for him to condemn the deliberate destruction of 108 ancient woodlands if HS2 does survive Chris Packham’s legal challenge? But that would involve having principles and not just being one of Boris’ yes-men….

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s