North West Hunt Saboteurs

Still hunting the hunters

Monthly Archives: May 2012

Cumbrian pair were on illegal hunting expedition

Two men who crossed the Border into Scotland on a “hunting expedition” for foxes or badgers have escaped a ban on keeping or owning dogs.

Sheriff Kenneth Ross at Dumfries told Ryan Lowe and Brian Sanderson that they were obviously now very well aware that type of hunting was highly illegal.

And he also rejected a motion to forfeit the four Lutcher type dogs and terrier that had been with them on farmland near Langholm.

But the Sheriff did order the forfeiture of a quantity of electronic equipment, said to be worth around £800.

The two men were appearing for sentence following a three-day trial in which they were found guilty of deliberately hunting foxes or badgers at Effgill at Westerkirk last May.

They were also found guilty of being in possession of items capable of being used for an offence contrary to the Protection of Badgers Act – the electronic equipment, dogs, two spades and two walkie-talkies.

Lowe, 30, of Baird Road, Harraby, Carlisle, was made the subject of a community payback order with a condition that he carry out 180 hours unpaid work, while the case against 40-year-old Brian Sanderson, of West Lane, Shap, was continued for three weeks to allow him to produce £1,000 to the court in which case the van worth £2,500 in which they had travelled north, would not be confiscated.

http://www.newsandstar.co.uk/news/1.960032

But on the other hand

Wildlife minister Richard Benyon under fire in another game-shooting case

Grouse estate burnt peatland that formed habitat of rare species – but legal case was dropped

Wednesday, 30 May 2012

Richard Benyon, the Wildlife minister, was under pressure last night to explain what influence he had on a decision to drop landmark legal proceedings against a grouse-shooting estate that was burning peatland in a conservation area.

Natural England, the Government’s environment watchdog, withdrew from an attempt to ban Walshaw Moor Estate from burning heather and other unauthorised activities in March. The case would have had major implications for moor owners, who burn heather to encourage new shoots, which are eaten by grouse increasing their numbers.

Conservationists expressed disappointment and surprise that the legal proceedings had been dropped. Walshaw Moor in the Pennines is a Site of Special Scientific Interest and the 16,000-acre estate is responsible for protecting its peatland, which includes the habitat of rare wading birds.

Natural England and Walshaw Estate Ltd issued a joint statement in March saying that they had resolved their dispute and that the estate had entered a “new management regime” in an agreement that was binding for 25 years. At the time the RSPB called the statement “opaque” and called for clarification on the details.

Mr Benyon, the Conservative minister responsible for wildlife protection at the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), who last week backed plans to shoot out the nests of buzzards to protect pheasants, is a keen supporter of game shooting.

Mark Avery, a former conservation director at the RSPB said: “It makes me wonder what influence did Defra or its grouse-shooting minister have on the dropping of Natural England’s legal case.” Mr Avery has submitted Freedom of Information requests to both Natural England and Defra. Only Natural England have so far responded and Mr Avery said he has not yet received a satisfactory explanation as to why it dropped legal proceedings.

Martin Harper, the RSPB’s current conservation director, said: “We are extremely concerned about how and why Natural England reached this decision. It came as a complete surprise, and raises a series of questions. We continue to seek an adequate clarification from Natural England of the process and thinking behind their decision.”

A spokesman for Natural England said: “The 25-year agreement Natural England and Walshaw Moor Estate have recently entered into provides improved environmental protection for the Moors and also allows the estate to conduct its business activities.

“The benefits of the agreement are significant. For the first time, burning activities on the Walshaw Estate will be subject to specific controls.”

Defra declined to comment on the decision to drop legal proceedings, saying it was a matter for Natural England.

Representatives for Walshaw Estate Ltd could not be reached for comment.

http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/nature/wildlife-minister-richard-benyon-under-fire-in-another-gameshooting-case-7801027.html

DEFRA backs down on buzzard ‘management’ trial!!

DEFRA backs down on buzzard ‘management’ trial!!

News just in, from Defra’s twitter account:

“We’ve listened to public concerns, so we are stopping current research and developing new proposals on #buzzards”

Fantastic news (well, at least until we find out what these ‘new proposals’ entail). A big, fat, massive WELL DONE to everyone who blogged, tweeted, emailed, petition-signed etc about this outrageous ‘study’. The people have been heard! It’s incredible to see how effective 9 days of campaigning can be!

We’ll post responses here as and when they are published:

RSPB response here

http://raptorpersecutionscotland.wordpress.com/2012/05/30/defra-backs-down-on-buzzard-management-trial/

Words fail me yet again!!!

Conservationists have condemned plans that would allow buzzard nests to be destroyed and the birds of prey taken into captivity to protect pheasant shoots.

The Environment Department (Defra) is to spend up to £375,000 researching ways to keep buzzards from targeting captive-reared pheasants.

Proposed methods include destroying nests to prevent birds breeding, catching and relocating buzzards to places such as falconry centres or providing alternative food sources for the predators.

The RSPB said the idea of taking wild buzzards into captivity or destroying their nests was “totally unacceptable”, and criticised Defra for spending hundreds of thousands of pounds on the project when money was tight for conservation measures.

In a document setting out plans for the research project, Defra said the 2011 National Gamekeepers Organisation survey found that three quarters of gamekeepers (76%) believed buzzards had a harmful effect on pheasant shoots.

Buzzards are thought to target pheasant release pens if they find there is a readily available source of food and the Government’s conservation agency Natural England has received a number of requests to license the killing of the bird of prey, which is a protected species.

In one case it was claimed that 25% to 30% of young pheasants were lost to buzzards, making the shoot unsustainable.

Buzzards have seen numbers increase by 146% between 1995 and 2009, although the increase appears to have levelled off between 2009 and 2010, according to the British Breeding Bird Survey.

But the RSPB said buzzards were eradicated from swathes of Britain by persecution and were only now recovering, as a result of legal protection and the warming of attitudes by many lowland land managers towards birds of prey.

Buzzards usually scavenge on animals which are already dead, but will sometimes take young pheasants released for sports shooting, the wildlife charity said.

Around 40 million pheasants, which are not native to the UK, are released for shooting each year and buzzards play only a small role in game bird losses compared to other factors such as collisions with cars, the RSPB said.

One study found just 1% to 2% of pheasants were taken on average by birds of prey.

The Government’s document says the impact of buzzards on pheasant shoots has not been investigated and the extent of the issue was unclear.

But it said there were a number of sites where buzzards could be contributing to losses, and that there was an urgent need for management measures to reduce the impact on pheasant shoots.

The RSPB’s conservation director Martin Harper said: “We are shocked by Defra’s plans to destroy buzzard nests and to take buzzards into captivity to protect a non-native game bird released in its millions.

“Destroying nests is completely unjustified and catching and removing buzzards is unlikely to reduce predation levels, as another buzzard will quickly take its place.

“Both techniques would be illegal under current wildlife laws, and I think most people will agree with us that reaching for primitive measures such as imprisoning buzzards or destroying their nests, when wildlife and economic interests collide, is totally unacceptable.”

Nigel Middleton, of the Hawk and Owl Conservation Trust, said destroying the nests of buzzards was tantamount to persecution.

“We believe that alternatives should always be sought to lethal control where the commercial interests of humans come into conflict with birds of prey.

And Mick Carroll, of the Northern England Raptor Forum, said: “Given that buzzards are still recovering from past persecution and there is no evidence they are a significant cause of loss, this is a scandalous waste of public money.”

The conservation groups called for the Government to abandon the project.

A Defra spokeswoman said: “The buzzard population in this country has been protected for over 30 years, and as the RSPB says, has resulted in a fantastic conservation story.

“At the same time we have cases of buzzards preying on young pheasants. We are looking at funding research to find ways of protecting these young birds while making sure the buzzard population continues to thrive.

“This research is about maintaining the balance between captive and wild birds.”

Shadow environment secretary Mary Creagh called for the Government to drop the project.

She said: “The restoration of the buzzard population has been a real success in recent years.

“It is astounding that Defra are wasting hundreds of thousands of pounds of taxpayers’ money disrupting this protected species.

“This out-of-touch Government’s priority is protecting the interests of large commercial shooting estates and non-native pheasants, rather than protecting our country’s native species.

“The Government should drop this plan now. This has all the hallmarks of another Defra shambles.”

David Taylor, shooting campaign manager for country sports group the Countryside Alliance, welcomed Defra’s decision to commission the study.

“It is however disappointing that the situation has got to the point where such a study is required.

“Since the early 1980s, successive governments have had the ability to issue licences for buzzard control, but have been reluctant to do so because of their fear of coming under pressure from groups who have a narrow interest in birds of prey, often to the detriment of other species in Britain.”

http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/nature/rspb-voices-shock-at-buzzard-plans-7784548.html

More badger diggers in court

16 April 2012

THREE men have appeared before Selby magistrates charged with digging for badgers.

The alleged offence is said to have taken place at High Eggborough Lane in Eggborough on January 8 this year, and ended with a terrier dog called Jake being injured.

Before the court were Lee Whinfrey, 28, Nathan Whinfrey, 25, and Richard Whinfrey, 43, all of Carcroft in Doncaster. All were charged with interfering with badger setts, hunting a wild mammal with dogs and digging for badgers.

Richard Whinfrey is also charged with causing unnecessary suffering to Jake, and failing to ensure the welfare of the dog.

Expert witnesses were required to give evidence in the case following the not guilty pleas of all three men.

The defendants were admitted to conditional bail – not to enter North Yorkshire unless attending court – until a three-day trial at the Selby court from August 29.

http://www.selbytimes.co.uk/news/local-news/badger-digging-1-4452658

 

‘Twisted’ badger baiter Anthony Lee jailed

A man who urged his dog to attack and kill badgers and kept footage of the fights on his phone has been jailed.

A magistrate wiped away tears while watching three videos of animal fights that Anthony Lee, 23, recorded.

Lee, of Coronation Way, Keighley, West Yorkshire, admitted three counts of animal fighting and was jailed for 23 weeks at Bradford Magistrates’ Court.

The RSPCA said the case was “as bad as one can get” and described Lee’s actions as “twisted and sick”.

It is just for their own twisted and sick kicks and there is a really high level of cruelty”

Carroll Lamport RSPCA

An imge from one of the videos taken by Anthony Lee of the badger baiting

An imge from one of the videos taken by Anthony Lee of the badger baiting

In the first video played to the court, a badger could be heard squealing alongside the sound of laughter from Lee and another person.

Life ban

The second video showed a badger being killed after being shaken around in Lee’s dog’s mouth while another dog had hold of it.

The third video showed a dog fighting a badger in its sett.

Badgers suffer an “extreme amount of pain” as a result of badger baiting and the dogs involved also suffer injuries, prosecutor Nigel Monaghan told the court.

He added: “In terms of animal cruelty the RSPCA regard this case as bad in terms of suffering and cruelty as one can get.”

Lee was given a three-week discount on the maximum sentence the court could hand down because he entered a guilty plea.

Chairman of the bench Robert Thornton said: “This is the most serious case we can think of.”

Lee was also banned from keeping or looking after animals for the rest of his life. Both of his dogs have been re-homed.

Badger baiters draw no financial benefit from their actions, RSPCA investigator Carroll Lamport said after the hearing.

He said: “It is just for their own twisted and sick kicks and there is a really high level of cruelty.”

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-18167422

 

Tiverton huntsman John Norrish jailed for four years for party rape

Tiverton huntsman John Norrish jailed for four years for party rape

Rapist John Norrish jailed for four years for rape

Rapist John Norrish jailed for four years for rape

A former huntmaster has been jailed for four years for raping a guest as he gave her a lift home following a ball.

John Norrish, 68, of East Worlington, near Tiverton denied rape but was found guilty by a jury.

The court heard he had sex with the woman, 33, in his car after she was too drunk to resist.

At Exeter Crown Court, the Tiverton Staghounds huntsman was sentenced and told by a judge his actions were a “grave abuse of a vulnerable woman”.

‘Passed out’

The court heard that Norrish offered the woman a lift home after the event in Chawleigh last July.

The victim told the jury: “He leaned across and tried to touch my neck and kiss my neck.

“I was just lying there, not making any noise. I was just scared and did not know what to do. I must have passed out.

“I was very drunk and it happened so fast. I asked him to stop and I thought he would. He was a strong man and I was not able to get him off.”

‘No consent’

She said she managed to get Norrish off her when the headlights of her husband’s car appeared.

She ran to him sobbing and saying she had been raped, the court heard.

In his defence Norrish told the court the woman had been sober and knew what she was doing.

He said she made no objection to having sex and had invented her story because she did not want her husband finding out.

The judge, Mr Justice Field, told Norrish: “She did not consent to your advances. She made no protest for the reason, I am sure, she was too drunk to exercise a free capacity whether to consent or not.”

He added: “The effect of what you did will endure for her for years to come.”

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-devon-18152160

 

Hunt members found guilty of illegally pursuing fox with hounds

Verdict is triumph for animal rights groups as trio from Crawley and Horsham Hunt convicted and fined

Three leading members of a Sussex hunt have been convicted of pursuing a fox illegally with hounds, in a case that will be seen a significant victory for animal rights activists.

Neill Millard

Neill Millard

The guilty verdicts at Haywards Heath magistrates court are a blow for the hunting community which is increasingly resentful of close scrutiny by monitors filming their pursuits.

Andrew Phillis, Neill Millard and Rachel Holdsworth, who are all members of the Crawley and Horsham Hunt, were convicted for breaching the hunting ban on different occasions last year.

Charges against a fourth member of the hunt were dropped two weeks ago during the lengthy trial. All three had denied the charges, saying they were out trail hunting — following an artificially laid scent – and did not plan to hunt or kill any foxes. They are expected to appeal against their convictions.

Phillis, 50, now of Totnes in Devon, who was formerly the Crawley and Horsham’s huntsman, and Rachel Holdsworth, of Pulborough, the hunt’s secretary, were found guilty for hunting illegally at Marlpost Wood, Southwater, on 18 January 2011.

Rachael Holdsworth

Rachael Holdsworth

Phillis, Holdsworth and Millard, 44, of Horsham, were found guilty of offences on 25 January at Shermanbury Place. Phillis was acquitted of another offence.

Holdsworth was fined £500 for each of the two offences and ordered to pay £2,500 costs. Millard, the founder of a wealth management firm in the City, was fined £1,000 and ordered to pay £2,500 costs. Phillis will be sentenced on a date to be fixed.

A Sussex police spokesman said: “The introduction of the 2004 Hunting Act was extremely emotive on both sides of the hunting spectrum and continues to be strongly debated. Evidence was provided that the accused had committed offences under the act and following early consultation with the CPS an investigation commenced and subsequently charges were made.

Andrew Phillis

Andrew Phillis

“As we have seen, District Judge Stephen Nichol has ruled that they are guilty of these offences and we are satisfied with his decision. It is the duty of the police to uphold the law and wherever offences such as this come to light, we will seek to bring them to justice.”

Simon Wild, of the West Sussex Wildlife Protection Group, gave evidence at the trial after filming the hunt. He said: “I’m very pleased with the verdicts. These sorts of things take a long time for the police to take them seriously.

“The next step is to go for hunts as corporate bodies so that there can be confiscation of their assets — like horseboxes and trailers.”

MPs have been promised a free vote on removing the 2004 ban on hunting mammals with dogs during the lifetime of this parliament but the presence of anti-hunting Conservatives in the latest intake means there is unlikely to be a majority for repeal.

During the trial, the Countryside Alliance said: “We continue to campaign for repeal of the atrocious Hunting Act and have great faith in hunting’s long-term future.”

Since the ban on hunting mammals with dogs came into force in 2005, only eight other hunt members have been convicted of breaking the law.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/may/14/hunt-members-guilty-fox-hounds

Hunt terrier man fined over fox ‘in a barrel’

A LEADING member of Peterborough’s Fitzwilliam Hunt has been fined for a breach of anti-hunting laws.

Gamekeeper John Bycroft (67), who is the terrier man to the Fitzwilliam Hunt, was found with another man using terriers to flush foxes from underground dens.

But he fell foul of the law after putting a live pregnant vixen in a tiny barrel because he “didn’t have the heart” to shoot her.

The Hunting Act demands that foxes flushed out of their dens are immediately shot dead by a competent person.

Police came across the two men only after being alerted to the sound of shooting in a field in Fen Road, Holbeach on April 25 last year, Spalding magistrates heard.

Officers found Bycroft and Jamie Round (24) nearby with an open horsebox with a plastic barrel inside. The barrel measured just 75cms high and 30cms across and contained a live fox.

The court heard Bycroft intended to release the fox elsewhere, but police ordered her to be freed on the spot.

Bycroft, of Weston Hills Road, Low Fulney, denied one offence under the Hunting Act 2004 and one under the Animal Welfare Act 2006, but both were proved at the end of a two day RSPCA prosecution.

He was ordered to pay a total of £2,065 – comprising fines of £525 for each offence, £1,000 costs and a £15 victim surcharge.

Jobless Round, of Penny Hill, Holbeach, denied identical offences. He was acquitted of the Hunting Act charge but found guilty of the Welfare Act charge, which involved confining the fox in a barrel with insufficient light, space, ventilation and a suitable environment to exhibit normal behaviour. Round was fined £165 and must pay £100 costs and a £15 victim surcharge.

The court heard that Bycroft had written consent to be on the neighbouring land.

Magistrates found neither man breached the trespass element of Hunting Act law, but Bycroft alone breached the provision requiring him to shoot the fox as soon as reasonably practical.

Solicitor Daven Naghen said Round did not have a gun and expected Bycroft to shoot the animal.

Solicitor Rachel Stevens said Bycroft is held in high regard as a gamekeeper.

She said Bycroft felt shooting the fox would have caused unnecessary suffering to her cubs.

There were ground nesting birds on the site where she was captured and he wanted to release her elsewhere.

No one for the hunt was available to comment.

http://www.peterboroughtoday.co.uk/news/local/hunt-terrier-man-fined-over-fox-in-a-barrel-1-3800746

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 57 other followers